Thursday, August 25, 2005

There is no end to Pat Robertson's craziness

That Crazy Fool is at it again. Now he's claiming he was "misinterpreted." Yes, apparently, when one says "we should take him out" that doesn't necessarily mean "kill the guy." Pat Robertson says "taking someone out" can mean merely "kidnapping" them. So was Pat Robertson suggesting that the U.S. government should kidnap Hugo Chavez? And hold him for ransom, maybe?

Here is my list of other possible meanings for the term "taking someone out" :

1) To brunch. A nice long meal between political enemies is one of my favorite things.

2) On a date. Is Pat Robertson a closet case? Maybe he's secretly attracted to Hugo Chavez (and who wouldn't be?) and this is the only way he can let his feelings be known.

3) On a stretcher. Technically, the person wouldn't have to be dead. Merely wounded would do.

4) To a club. The youngsters like hiphop and such, but I prefer a Blues joint. Perhaps Chavez and Robertson will salsa 'til dawn.

5) To the Dollar Store. It's ridiculous to pay full price for shampoo when you can get the same stuff at Dollar General for $1.00. Snooty people may avoid D.G., but I'm betting a good leftist like Mr. Chavez would appreciate the good buys. Pat Robertson, however, seems like a bit of a spendthrift to me.

6) To swim with the fishes...actually, I think this _is_ what "taking someone out" means.

Any other suggestions? Pat? Anybody?

P.S. I promise, I promise. More weird religious stuff tomorrow. It's worth the wait!!

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?